Canon XTI Body Compare, Reviews, Discounts
 |
Canon XTI Body Compare, Reviews, Discounts.
Product: Canon XTI Body Amazon Price: Too low to display Availability: In Stock |
Compare Prices on Canon XTI Body
[This is the same review I posted for the kit. If you're getting the body because you don't like the 18-55 lens, hold in mind that some dealers offer this camera in a kit with the distinguished nicer 17-85 USM IS (image stabalization) zoom.]
The modern Digital Rebel XTi camera should appeal to a wide variety of users: those wishing to upgrade from a point & shoot digital, or those wishing to improve upon their first generation digital SLRs. Features and value produce this a 5-star camera, but it won't be everyone's cup of tea.
Compared to the previous Digital Rebel XT, principal improvements are:
1) 10.1 megapixels. In digital camera circles, this is like saying a car has more horsepower than an older car. While this alone doesn't mean "better" pictures, in reality, combined with other improvements in hardware & software, the results typically are better.;
2) 2.5" LCD panel. This alone has more than one advantage. The distinct first one is that our pictures explore larger in review. The second, and for someone approaching 50 (like myself), is that the LCD is now outmoded for all the camera's data (shutter hurry, aperture, shots left, etc.) . It's noteworthy easier to read than the runt LCD typically located on the top of the cameras. It might spend up the batteries quicker, but, heck, if you can contemplate the info this noteworthy easier, then so be it. One complaint, it does not appear that the data rotates when you do verticals (like the Sony Alpha 100) .;
3) 9-point AF. The number of points are improved from 7, but the true key here is that it's the system from the 30D, which had a powerful higher degree of accuracy than the previous Rebels.;
4) Portray Styles. I didn't really luxuriate in them at first, but simply do, this is like the days of film, when we could employ a "portrait" film or "landscape" film. For those that don't like to do a lot of computer work, these can be VERY handy in getting the proper gaze in the camera.;
5) Dust cleaning system. OK, I deem the dust jam will probably be a miniature overblown, now that Canon offers a solution, but it is a exact, if not expansive, threat. Additionally, the method Canon has implemented it is second to none. The first is through hardware. An ultrasonic filter can simply shake the dust off. Second is through software. If you residence a atrocious fraction that won't shake off, you can do a reference shot, and have the dust removed by software on your computer.;
6) The grip has been improved a small. The rubber on the grip is improved, and an anti-slip strip has been placed on the relieve where the correct thumb goes.
Most all other things Canon is know for smooth exists. The camera focus swiftly and quietly. Camera operations are hasty and easy to locate and employ. Pictures gaze grand.
Now for the other side. This is an modern time in that all the substantial players are comming out with a 10 megapixel camera at the same time, so the Canon has some stiff competition. Here goes a simple comparison.
1) Compared to the other two cameras already available, the Sony A100 and Nikon D80 (both also 5-star cameras), the XTi is considerably smaller, and somewhat lighter. Some will like this, even some with medium to medium-large hands. But most people with larger, and some with somewhat smaller hands may steal the other two choices.;
2) The battery is somewhat smaller than its rival's, and may drain a bit faster due to the LCD being extinct for info all the time.;
3) Functionally, the rear LCD is not as nice as the Sony's. The Sony's rotates, can be spot to enlarged type (50+ user again), and the system that turns it off as your watch approaches also starts the AF on the Sony. [Although many like the top LCD, the Nikon draw of needing to push a button on the benefit, then peak over the top to notice what you're setting is not as nice].;
4) No in camera stabalization. The A100 can shift the sensor to assist eliminate camera shake. Nikon and Canon require you to remove rather expensive lenses to secure the anti-shake.;
Also, soon to be added to the competion will be the Pentax K10D. Specs are sketchy proper now, but it appears to be enter the competition as a 10 megapixel camera with built-in anti-shake (mighty like their K100D) .
Of these 3 currently on the market, the Canon is the least expensive; therefore, it's up to the other 2 to point to they are worth more, a very difficult task, indeed.
You'll rep plenty of technical reviews on the web regarding features and specs for this camera.
The best thing I mediate I can provide is my short experience with this camera, so if you mature to have a high slay P&S camera and is looking to dive into the DSLR world, you are where I was a few weeks ago.
I owned a Sony F717 which I really loved, but honestly, all I did was dwelling it to Auto and bewitch valid pictures. The jam was that I had a toddler at home that doesn't really like to wait till the camera took a few secs to focus and grasp the pic. I was missing those smiles and moments fair because the Sony couldn't seize pics mercurial enough.
I decided to behold into newer cameras... Initially my budget was around $400 and I was looking to select the Canon S3. But after spending several weeks online reading reviews (like you probably are correct now), I decided that I wanted a DSLR (you'll acquire plenty of technical reasons in the web and other reviews) . I was then ready to steal the Canon Xt (But the Xti was unbiased around the corner, so I decided to wait a couple more weeks and when the Xti was finally released on Sep 1st, I went to Best Win and got mine)
It's my third week with the camera, and I'm loving it. I can prefer pictures of my son faster than he can say "bugga bugga bugga". While I'm level-headed learning how to spend the camera to its potential (I've been trying to learn how to shoot pictures in manual mode instead of rotund automatic), I've been fully joyful with the results so far.
If you're doing what I did last month, you're probably reading tons of reviews of this camera, the Canon Xt, Nikon D50, Nikon D70, Nikon D80, etc. Don't raze your time on the details.. They're all superb cameras, and if you're coming from P&S, any of these cameras will be an awesome one for you to learn.
I warn you though. The biggest trouble of buying this camera is that you'll soon be lusting after lenses... Now I use hours on the web checking reviews of Canon, Sigma and Tamron lenses, and contain it or not, it's remarkable harder to engage lenses than to purchase a camera.
PS: A Grand book I I got was "Notion Exposure" by Bryan Peterson. I actually got the book before the camera, and it was one of the main deciding factors that got me into DSLR instead of a pro P&S. The pictures that Bryan shows in this book are improbable and you need control. Now I'm paranoid with getting the smallest Depth of Field possible in my son's pictures (You'll understand this if you net this book or any other that explains concepts of Exposure)
Update (10/04) : After weeks digging forums and reviews, I decided to buy 2 lenses... The canon 50 f1.8 and the canon 70-300 IS. I'm not going to go over the details for these lenses in this review, but wanted to let you guys know that deciding which camera was the easy portion. Deciding the lenses is where all the afflict resides.
I had the Rebel XT and about 8 lenses and was thinking of getting an upgraded second camera body. So when it came out the 30D was a logical choice, but it was not really mighty of an upgrade from the 20D, which I resisted, so I was not really certain what to do. Then I had all but decided to honest recall the fall and net the 30D when I heard the first rumblings about the XTi.
Then I started to learn the details about the XTi, more mega pixels, same auto focus, same camouflage, portray styles, dust cleaning! The only areas that the 30D won in my conception were construct quality, set meter, and estimated shutter life. Those 3 categories were not enough to convince me that the 30D was worth $300-$400 more than the XTi especially since the XTi had won or tied in most categories. The scheme I recognize at it is that the camera bodies are not nearly as distinguished as the lenses, they change so mercurial that it is not worth it to me to employ more for longevity when it will be outdated in a year anyway. Expend $1,500 on a lens, spend it for a lifetime, consume $1,500 on a camera body, regret it in a year. I fully examine the upgrade to the 30D to be released within a year, and now that I have saved by getting the XTi I will have all that distinguished more to achieve towards it when it comes out.
So basically what I am saying is that, in my understanding, the XTi is impartial as respectable, if not better than the semi-pro 30D, so why pay more? Switching from the XT to the XTi was very simple, I can exercise them both now without any problems. The batteries, battery grips, remote shutter release, and most of the other accessories are also compatible with both, which is nice to maintain the amount of gear you need to carry to a minimum.
Unless you want to recede up to a beefy frame sensor, I can't explore any reasons why you would not want to go with this camera. If you read books on photography from impartial 1 or 2 years ago you will realize that this "entry level" camera has features that were not even available on top of the line ($5,000+) camera bodies. With the hurry that camera bodies come you might as well take the entry level body every year instead of making a tall investment in the pro level bodies and then being shown up by something 10% of that impress in a year or two. Not that there are not reasons to bewitch one of those bodies, I impartial don't seem have any of them.
